Quick Takeaways
- The European Commission is considering a major rollback or delay of the EU’s 2035 combustion engine ban amid mounting industrial and political pressure.
- The outcome could significantly reshape Europe’s automotive competitiveness, powertrain strategies, and EV transition pace.
On December 15, the EU 2035 combustion engine ban emerged as a focal point of policy debate, with the European Commission preparing to announce a significant revision to its long-term vehicle emissions roadmap. The move reflects growing political and industrial pressure as European automakers struggle to maintain competitiveness amid intensifying global rivalry.
EU officials are considering options that could delay the 2035 deadline by up to five years or weaken the ban’s enforcement indefinitely. The original regulation, adopted in 2023, mandated that all new passenger cars and vans sold across the European Union must be carbon-neutral by 2035, effectively ending sales of internal combustion engine vehicles.
EU 2035 Combustion Engine Ban Under Review
The proposed revision would mark the most substantial rollback of EU climate legislation in recent years. Germany and Italy, supported by several major automotive manufacturers, have argued that the transition timeline under the EU 2035 combustion engine ban places excessive strain on Europe’s industrial base during a period of global market disruption.
Industry leaders warn that rising production costs, supply-chain dependencies, and pricing pressure from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers are undermining the competitiveness of European brands. These concerns have amplified calls for a more flexible regulatory approach that balances decarbonization goals with economic resilience.
Automaker Divisions Over Combustion Engine Phase-Out
The debate has exposed clear divisions within the automotive sector. Legacy manufacturers have advocated for easing the EU 2035 combustion engine ban to protect employment, investment capacity, and manufacturing scale. For companies with large internal combustion portfolios, the current policy is viewed as commercially restrictive in an uneven global transition.
In contrast, electric vehicle specialists argue that weakening the regulation risks slowing Europe’s electrification momentum. They caution that regulatory uncertainty could weaken long-term investment confidence and allow Chinese manufacturers to consolidate their technological and cost advantages in global EV markets.
Strategic Implications for Europe’s Automotive Industry
A reversal or delay of the EU 2035 combustion engine ban would reshape product planning, capital allocation, and powertrain strategies across the region. Carmakers would gain additional flexibility to balance electric, hybrid, and combustion technologies, but the shift could also dilute Europe’s leadership ambitions in zero-emission mobility.
As the European Commission finalizes its proposal, policymakers face the challenge of aligning climate objectives with industrial competitiveness. The decision is expected to have lasting implications for Europe’s automotive supply chain, innovation trajectory, and position in the global electric vehicle race.
EU officials are considering options that could delay the 2035 deadline by up to five years or weaken the ban’s enforcement indefinitely. The original regulation, adopted in 2023, mandated that all new passenger cars and vans sold across the European Union must be carbon-neutral by 2035, effectively ending sales of internal combustion engine vehicles.
EU 2035 Combustion Engine Ban Under Review
The proposed revision would mark the most substantial rollback of EU climate legislation in recent years. Germany and Italy, supported by several major automotive manufacturers, have argued that the transition timeline under the EU 2035 combustion engine ban places excessive strain on Europe’s industrial base during a period of global market disruption.
Industry leaders warn that rising production costs, supply-chain dependencies, and pricing pressure from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers are undermining the competitiveness of European brands. These concerns have amplified calls for a more flexible regulatory approach that balances decarbonization goals with economic resilience.
- Rising manufacturing and compliance costs impacting margins
- Growing competitive pressure from lower-cost Chinese EV producers
- Supply-chain vulnerabilities affecting scale and speed of transition
Automaker Divisions Over Combustion Engine Phase-Out
The debate has exposed clear divisions within the automotive sector. Legacy manufacturers have advocated for easing the EU 2035 combustion engine ban to protect employment, investment capacity, and manufacturing scale. For companies with large internal combustion portfolios, the current policy is viewed as commercially restrictive in an uneven global transition.
In contrast, electric vehicle specialists argue that weakening the regulation risks slowing Europe’s electrification momentum. They caution that regulatory uncertainty could weaken long-term investment confidence and allow Chinese manufacturers to consolidate their technological and cost advantages in global EV markets.
Strategic Implications for Europe’s Automotive Industry
A reversal or delay of the EU 2035 combustion engine ban would reshape product planning, capital allocation, and powertrain strategies across the region. Carmakers would gain additional flexibility to balance electric, hybrid, and combustion technologies, but the shift could also dilute Europe’s leadership ambitions in zero-emission mobility.
As the European Commission finalizes its proposal, policymakers face the challenge of aligning climate objectives with industrial competitiveness. The decision is expected to have lasting implications for Europe’s automotive supply chain, innovation trajectory, and position in the global electric vehicle race.
Share: